[RFC]: migrate `utils` packages to `object` (tracking issue)

[Neerajpathak07]

Description

This RFC proposes migrating the following list of packages from utils namespace to object:

• utils/move-property => object/move-property
• utils/object-inverse => object/inverse
• utils/object-inverse-by => object/inverse-by
• utils/capitalize-keys => object/capitalize-keys
• utils/uncapitalize-keys => object/uncapitalize-keys
• utils/lowercase-keys => object/lowercase-keys
• utils/uppercase-keys => object/uppercase-keys
• utils/for-in=> object/for-in
• utils/for-own => object/for-own
• utils/common-keys => object/common-keys
• utils/common-keys-in => object/common-keys-in
• utils/bifurcate-in => object/bifurcate-in
• utils/bifurcate-own => object/bifurcate-own
• utils/deep-get => object/deep-get
• utils/deep-set => object/deep-set
• utils/entries => object/entries
• utils/entries-in => object/entries-in
• utils/from-entries => object/from-entries
• utils/get-prototype-of => object/get-prototype-of
• utils/group-in => object/group-in
• utils/group-own => object/group-own
• utils/inherited-keys => object/inherited-keys
• utils/map-keys => object/map-keys
• utils/nonindex-keys => object/nonindex-keys
• utils/values => object/values
• utils/values-in => object/values-in

Related Issues

Related issues #7374 & #7372

Questions

No.

Other

No.

Checklist

• I have read and understood the Code of Conduct.
• Searched for existing issues and pull requests.
• The issue name begins with RFC:.

[Sahilxrajput]

Hi @Neerajpathak07, are you currently working on this issue? If not, I’d be happy to take it up.