Should archived repos be listed on groups pages?

[vivienlacourba]

The exposed boolean in w3c.json has some default value for public and private repos but it is not clear how it applies to archived repos.

With @plehegar we thought that W3C Groups would not want to advertise their private repositories on their group page and did not thought of any use cases where they would.

My suggestion is that the exposed bit is orthogonal to the archived state, in which case it is simply an implementation decision for the groups page to decide whether to include, display separately or simply omit archived repos altogether.
And if we were to later display archived repos on groups pages then we would honor their exposed value.

@deniak, @plehegar, @dontcallmedom does that sounds good to you?

[dontcallmedom]

to make sure I parse this right, the idea is that archived repos wouldn't be displayed in group pages at the moment; and if one day they would be, it would be done based on their exposed attribute, with the same defaults as non-archived repos?

I would have a slight preference for the default for archived repos to be exposed: false, but since that's not a current problem, I'm not sure it matters all that much

[vivienlacourba]

to make sure I parse this right, the idea is that archived repos wouldn't be displayed in group pages at the moment; and if one day they would be, it would be done based on their exposed attribute, with the same defaults as non-archived repos?

That's right.