Skip to content

Conversation

@Aarohi-Sinha
Copy link
Contributor

@Aarohi-Sinha Aarohi-Sinha commented Oct 5, 2025

Description

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update
  • Code refactoring
  • Performance improvement
  • Other (please describe):

Related Issue

Fixes #56

Changes Made

  • Updated the bug report template by adding all the relevant LLM providers

Testing

  • Tested with Gemini API
  • Tested with Grok API
  • Tested on Windows
  • Tested on Linux
  • Tested on macOS
  • Added/updated tests (if applicable)

Checklist

  • My code follows the project's code style
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings or errors
  • I have tested this in a real Git repository
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines

Screenshots (if applicable)

Additional Notes


For Hacktoberfest Participants

  • This PR is submitted as part of Hacktoberfest 2025

Thank you for your contribution! 🎉

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the Bug Report template to expand LLM provider options from a placeholder to a comprehensive list: Gemini, Grok, Groq, Claude, OpenAI, Ollama.
    • Improves clarity and consistency when selecting a provider during issue submission; no changes to the report flow or logic.
    • Helps triage by capturing accurate provider context from reporters.
    • Existing fields and guidance remain unchanged.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 5, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated the bug report template to expand the “LLM Provider” field from a single placeholder to a multi-option list: Gemini, Grok, Groq, Claude, OpenAI, Ollama. No other changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Issue templates
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md
Expanded LLM provider options from “Gemini or Grok” to a list: Gemini, Grok, Groq, Claude, OpenAI, Ollama.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I nibble notes with careful cheer,
Six providers hop in here!
Gemini, Grok, Groq in a row,
Claude and OpenAI join the show—
Ollama too, we’re good to go!
Bug reports neat, ears up high,
Carrot approved—let’s verify. 🥕

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title “Update bug report template” clearly and concisely summarizes the primary change of modifying the bug report template without including extraneous details, directly reflecting the focus of the pull request.
Linked Issues Check ✅ Passed The changes fully address issue #56 by expanding the bug report template’s LLM provider list to include Gemini, Groq, Grok, Claude, OpenAI, and Ollama as specified, with no deviations from the documented requirements.
Out of Scope Changes Check ✅ Passed Only the bug report template file was updated and exclusively to alter the provider list, so there are no unrelated or out-of-scope changes in the pull request.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 57729f5 and 4176ff7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md (1)

27-27: Provider list looks good

All requested LLM providers are now represented in the template as expected.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@DFanso DFanso self-requested a review October 5, 2025 21:46
@DFanso DFanso added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers hacktoberfest Eligible for Hacktoberfest hacktoberfest-accepted Approved Hacktoberfest contribution labels Oct 5, 2025
Copy link
Owner

@DFanso DFanso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved 🎊

@DFanso DFanso merged commit add80cf into DFanso:main Oct 5, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers hacktoberfest Eligible for Hacktoberfest hacktoberfest-accepted Approved Hacktoberfest contribution

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Documentation] Outdated Bug Report Template

2 participants