Upgrade @google-cloud/storage to address vulnerabilities #114
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
greghuels
requested changes
Dec 29, 2025
greghuels
reviewed
Dec 29, 2025
package.json
Outdated
| "dependencies": { | ||
| "@eppo/js-client-sdk-common": "4.15.2" | ||
| "@eppo/js-client-sdk-common": "4.15.2", | ||
| "jws": "^4.0.0" |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
jws is already upgraded to 4.0.1 by upgradging @google-cloud/storage, so this line should be removed.
greghuels
approved these changes
Dec 30, 2025
aarsilv
deleted the
aarsilv/ffesupport-419/address-high-dependency-vulnerabilities
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Eppo Internal:
🎟️ Ticket: FFESUPPORT-419 - Address node-server-sdk high vulnerabilities
Motivation and Context
Address the following vulnerabilities:
Description
Upgrade dev dependency
@google-cloud/storagewhich is what contained these vulnerabilitiesHow has this been documented?
n/a
How has this been tested?
Existing automated tests