first pass on a QA script

[mikemhenry]

First pass on a script to QA using our RelativeHybridTopologyProtocol

Checklist

• Added a news entry

Developers certificate of origin

• I certify that this contribution is covered by the MIT License here and the Developer Certificate of Origin at https://developercertificate.org/.

[github-actions]

No API break detected ✅

[mikemhenry]

@IAlibay let me know if you have any feedback, I think pulling down the benchmark repo or using a local copy would be a nice improvement.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.74%. Comparing base (d2e84ee) to head (fc822c8).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1306      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.79%   92.74%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         141      141              
  Lines       10863    10868       +5     
==========================================
- Hits        10080    10079       -1     
- Misses        783      789       +6     

Flag	Coverage Δ
fast-tests	92.74% <ø> (?)
slow-tests	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[IAlibay]

🤔 This might be worth discussing, I'm wondering if this is the right place for this to exist.

Ideally we would want to have this in a place where we can also store results. We still need to clean up openfe-benchmarks, but maybe there?

To explain what I'm thinking a bit more, I can see this becoming a thing that grows to be more automated over time, especially if you do things like pulling down the benchmark repo automatically etc... and so maybe it should be somewhere we can test it etc..

[mikemhenry]

I agree, I think it needs to live somewhere, my thoughts putting it here is it isn't shipped with the package and isn't in a very public place, I worry about putting it in the benchmark repo right now since it doesn't have a ton of visibility, I do think it should get tested, happy to put it somewhere else!