Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 19, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@Zffu
Copy link
Member

@Zffu Zffu commented Dec 12, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced lexer functionality with dynamic memory allocation for tokens.
    • Streamlined token handling and processing logic.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling and boundary condition management in lexer processing.
  • Documentation

    • Updated method signatures for the runLexer function to reflect changes in input handling.
  • Refactor

    • Removed the Token structure and restructured the LexerResult for better token management.
    • Simplified TokenType enumeration and removed outdated keyword handling functions.

@Zffu Zffu self-assigned this Dec 12, 2024
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve significant restructuring of the lexer functionality across multiple files. The runLexer function in lexer.c has been updated to use dynamic memory allocation for tokens, replacing the static array approach. The Token structure has been removed from lexer.h, and the LexerResult structure has been modified to accommodate dynamic token handling. Additionally, the tokens.h file has seen changes in the TokenType enumeration and the introduction of a new Token structure, reflecting a shift towards a more flexible token management system.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/lexer/lexer.c Restructured runLexer to use dynamic memory for tokens, simplified token handling, updated method signature.
src/lexer/lexer.h Removed Token structure, modified LexerResult to use dynamic tokens, updated runLexer parameter type.
src/lexer/tokens.h Removed keyword size definitions, modified TokenType enum, added new Token structure, removed keyword functions.

Poem

In the land of code where tokens play,
A rabbit hops with joy today.
Dynamic arrays now hold the key,
To lexing dreams, wild and free!
With fewer bounds and clearer paths,
Let's celebrate with joyful laughs! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Zffu Zffu merged commit d5a602d into master Dec 12, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/lexer/tokens.h (2)

5-24: Consider explicit values for enum TokenType

While allowing the compiler to assign values automatically to enums is acceptable, explicitly assigning values can improve readability and maintainability, especially if values have specific meanings or are used externally.

Assign explicit integer values to each TokenType if they have significance beyond the code (e.g., for debugging or interfacing with other systems).


30-32: Initialize value to NULL in struct Token

Ensure that the value member of struct Token is initialized to NULL to prevent undefined behavior when it's not assigned explicitly.

Modify the token initialization code to set value to NULL by default.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dd34685 and 64839fa.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/lexer/lexer.c (2 hunks)
  • src/lexer/lexer.h (1 hunks)
  • src/lexer/tokens.h (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/lexer/lexer.h (1)

12-12: Change to dynamic tokens array requires careful memory management

Changing tokens from a fixed-size array to a pointer necessitates proper allocation and deallocation to prevent memory leaks.

Ensure that all usages of LexerResult properly manage the tokens pointer. Would you like me to search for all instances where LexerResult is used to confirm that memory is managed correctly?

Comment on lines +33 to +46
int buffLen = 32;
char* buff = malloc(buffLen);

if(c == ' ' || c == '\t' || c == '\n') {
continue;
} else if (isdigit(c)) {
int numLen = 0;

while(isdigit(c)) {
buff[numLen] = c;
numLen++;

c = *string++;
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Potential buffer overflow due to fixed buffer size

The buffers buff allocated with a fixed size of 32 bytes may overflow if the tokens (numbers, strings, keywords) are longer than 31 characters (reserving one byte for the null terminator). There is no check to prevent writing beyond the allocated memory, which can lead to undefined behavior or security vulnerabilities.

Apply this diff to implement dynamic resizing of buff:

33     int buffLen = 32;
34     char* buff = malloc(buffLen);
+     int buffIndex = 0;
      ...
42         buff[numLen] = c;
43         numLen++;
+         buffIndex++;
+         if (buffIndex >= buffLen - 1) { // Resize if needed
+             buffLen *= 2;
+             buff = realloc(buff, buffLen);
+             if (buff == NULL) {
+                 // Handle allocation failure
+             }
+         }
45         c = *string++;

Repeat similar changes for string parsing (lines 54-59) and keyword parsing (lines 67-72).

Also applies to: 54-59, 67-72

Comment on lines +33 to +35
int buffLen = 32;
char* buff = malloc(buffLen);

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Memory leak: buff is not freed after use

The buffer buff is allocated with malloc but is not freed after it's no longer needed, leading to memory leaks.

Ensure that buff is freed after assigning it to result.tokens[result.size - 1].value or if it's no longer needed. For tokens that don't store buff, free it before moving to the next iteration.

+     // After using buff
+     if (buff_needed) {
+         result.tokens[result.size - 1].value = buff;
+     } else {
+         free(buff);
+     }

Also applies to: 52-52, 64-64

Comment on lines +41 to +46
while(isdigit(c)) {
buff[numLen] = c;
numLen++;

c = *string++;
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Missing null terminators in token values

When collecting characters for numbers and keywords, the buffers are not null-terminated, which can lead to undefined behavior when used as strings.

Add a null terminator at the end of the buffers after the loops.

46     }
+     buff[numLen] = '\0';

Apply similar changes for keyword parsing.

Also applies to: 67-72

Comment on lines +114 to +115
result.tokens[result.size - 1].value[0] = c;
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Uninitialized value field in MATH_OP tokens

For math operator tokens, you're assigning c to result.tokens[result.size - 1].value[0], but value is not allocated, which may cause undefined behavior.

Allocate memory for value before assigning to it.

114     pushToken(&result, MATH_OP);
+       result.tokens[result.size - 1].value = malloc(2);
115     result.tokens[result.size - 1].value[0] = c;
+       result.tokens[result.size - 1].value[1] = '\0';
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
result.tokens[result.size - 1].value[0] = c;
}
result.tokens[result.size - 1].value = malloc(2);
result.tokens[result.size - 1].value[0] = c;
result.tokens[result.size - 1].value[1] = '\0';
}

Comment on lines +27 to +28
result.tokens = malloc(sizeof(struct Token) * 1024);

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Fixed-size token array may cause overflow

Allocating result.tokens with a fixed size of 1024 tokens could lead to overflow if processing inputs with more tokens.

Implement dynamic resizing for result.tokens to handle inputs with more than 1024 tokens.

27     int tokensCapacity = 1024;
27     result.tokens = malloc(sizeof(struct Token) * tokensCapacity);
      ...
+     // Before pushing a new token
+     if (result.size >= tokensCapacity) {
+         tokensCapacity *= 2;
+         result.tokens = realloc(result.tokens, sizeof(struct Token) * tokensCapacity);
+         if (result.tokens == NULL) {
+             // Handle allocation failure
+         }
+     }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +54 to +59
while(c != '\"') {
buff[strLen] = c;
strLen++;

c = *string++;
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Infinite loop risk when parsing strings

The loop while(c != '\"') doesn't check for the end of the string. If a closing quote is missing, this will cause an infinite loop.

Modify the loop condition to check for the null terminator to prevent infinite loops.

54     while(c != '\"' && c != '\0') {
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
while(c != '\"') {
buff[strLen] = c;
strLen++;
c = *string++;
}
while(c != '\"' && c != '\0') {
buff[strLen] = c;
strLen++;
c = *string++;
}

* Returns a LexerResult containing the tokens
*/
struct LexerResult runLexer(const char* input);
struct LexerResult runLexer(char* input);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Changing input parameter to char* may lead to unintended modifications

The runLexer function now takes a char* instead of a const char*, which allows modification of the input string. This could cause unexpected side effects if the input string is used elsewhere.

If the function does not need to modify the input string, change the parameter back to const char*.

@Zffu Zffu deleted the refactor/lexer-tokens branch December 24, 2024 12:08
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants