Skip to content

Conversation

@gzliudan
Copy link
Collaborator

@gzliudan gzliudan commented Feb 11, 2026

Proposed changes

  • Avoid panics in update() by guarding XDPoS-only channels when the engine is not XDPoS.
  • Skip work commits when XDPoS config is enabled but the engine is not XDPoS, with height-based log throttling.
  • Add regression tests for non-XDPoS update loop and XDPoS config/engine mismatch.

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to XDC network?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation Update (if none of the other choices apply)
  • Regular KTLO or any of the maintaince work. e.g code style
  • CICD Improvement

Impacted Components

Which part of the codebase this PR will touch base on,

Put an in the boxes that apply

  • Consensus
  • Account
  • Network
  • Geth
  • Smart Contract
  • External components
  • Not sure (Please specify below)

Checklist

Put an in the boxes once you have confirmed below actions (or provide reasons on not doing so) that

  • This PR has sufficient test coverage (unit/integration test) OR I have provided reason in the PR description for not having test coverage
  • Provide an end-to-end test plan in the PR description on how to manually test it on the devnet/testnet.
  • Tested the backwards compatibility.
  • Tested with XDC nodes running this version co-exist with those running the previous version.
  • Relevant documentation has been updated as part of this PR
  • N/A

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 11, 2026 04:41
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 11, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Guards XDPoS-specific mining worker logic to avoid unsafe type assertions against w.engine when the consensus engine is not *XDPoS.XDPoS.

Changes:

  • Adds an *XDPoS.XDPoS type assertion guard in worker.update() and reuses the asserted engine for channel access.
  • Makes checkPreCommit() resilient to non-XDPoS engines by conditionally using XDPoS-specific parent selection and turn-check logic.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@gzliudan gzliudan force-pushed the guard-worker branch 5 times, most recently from c6d1f44 to 635b6aa Compare February 11, 2026 07:10
@gzliudan gzliudan changed the title fix(miner): guard XDPoS-specific worker paths fix(miner): avoid XDPoS-only paths on non-XDPoS engines Feb 11, 2026
@gzliudan gzliudan requested a review from Copilot February 11, 2026 07:21
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines 50 to 57
done := make(chan struct{})
go func() {
worker.update()
close(done)
}()

select {
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 11, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test can pass without actually exercising worker.update if the goroutine doesn’t get scheduled promptly (e.g., under heavy CI load): the first select will hit time.After and succeed even if update never started. Add a small synchronization handshake (e.g., a started channel closed right before calling worker.update(), then wait for it with a timeout) so the test reliably asserts update is running before checking it doesn’t return early.

Suggested change
done := make(chan struct{})
go func() {
worker.update()
close(done)
}()
select {
done := make(chan struct{})
started := make(chan struct{})
go func() {
close(started)
worker.update()
close(done)
}()
select {
case <-started:
// worker.update has started; proceed with timing checks.
case <-time.After(time.Second):
t.Fatal("worker.update did not start in time")
}
select {

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant