Skip to content

Conversation

@pavanimanchala53
Copy link
Contributor

@pavanimanchala53 pavanimanchala53 commented Jan 1, 2026

Related Issue

Closes #cla check

Summary

signing as swaroop manchala

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added a new contributor record to the project's contributor license agreement registry, enabling formal participation in the project.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 1, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new CLA signer entry for "Swaroop Manchala" is added to the individuals array in .github/cla-signers.json with associated metadata including GitHub username, email, signature date, and CLA version reference.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CLA Signers Registry
\.github/cla-signers.json
Added new signer entry to individuals array: name "Swaroop Manchala", github_username "renoschubert", email "pavanimanchala53@gmail.com", signed_date "2026-01-01", cla_version "1.0"

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • Anshgrover23
  • Suyashd999

Poem

🐰 A signature hops into our file,
Renoschubert joins with a smile,
Swaroop's name now etched in stone,
Our CLA garden has grown! ✨

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description is incomplete and lacks critical details required by the template. The related issue reference is vague, and required checklist items are missing. Provide a proper issue number reference, expand the summary with details about the change, and include the complete checklist with status checks for tests and other requirements.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately and concisely describes the main change: adding a new person (Swaroop Manchala) to the CLA signers file.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 1, 2026

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4af662e and ca9177b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/cla-signers.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: Build Package
  • GitHub Check: test (3.11)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.10)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.12)

@Suyashd999
Copy link
Collaborator

closing since both @pavanimanchala53 and @SWAROOP323 users already exist in cla-signers.json

image

@Suyashd999 Suyashd999 closed this Jan 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants