Skip to content

Conversation

@ThankaBharathi
Copy link
Contributor

@ThankaBharathi ThankaBharathi commented Jan 13, 2026

Summary

Adds Thanka Bharathi TM to the CLA signers list to satisfy CLA requirements.

Related Issue

Closes #588

Type of Change

  • Documentation update

AI Disclosure

  • No AI used

Testing

  • Validated cla-signers.json format locally.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated contributor records and administrative configurations.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 13, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a new contributor's CLA signature entry to the individuals array in .github/cla-signers.json. The entry includes the signer's name, GitHub username, email address, signature date, and CLA version reference.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CLA Signer Registration
\.github/cla-signers\.json
Added new individual signer entry with name "Thanka Bharathi TM", GitHub username "ThankaBharathi", email address "thankabharathi0@gmail.com", signed date "2026-01-13", and CLA version "1.0" to the individuals array.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • mikejmorgan-ai
  • Anshgrover23

Poem

🐰 A new signature hops into place,
In JSON fields, we've found our space,
Thanka Bharathi joins the CLA line,
With emails and dates all aligned—how divine! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the primary change: adding a person to the CLA signers list.
Description check ✅ Passed The description covers the main change, related issue, change type, and AI disclosure; however, the template requires a PR title format checklist item that is not addressed.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed The PR successfully implements the requirements from issue #588 by adding Thanka Bharathi's entry with all required fields matching the issue details.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed All changes are in-scope; only the CLA signers file is modified to add the single entry requested in issue #588.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5413bec and fb697b5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/cla-signers.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/cla-signers.json (1)

234-242: Verify the name format matches the legal name.

The entry is well-formed and follows the existing schema. However, the linked issue #588 specifies the full legal name as "Thanka Bharathi T M" (with a space between T and M), while the entry has "Thanka Bharathi TM" (no space).

If "TM" is the intended format, this looks good. Otherwise, consider updating to match the exact legal name from the CLA submission.

Potential fix if space is required
-      "name": "Thanka Bharathi TM",
+      "name": "Thanka Bharathi T M",

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @ThankaBharathi, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the project's Contributor License Agreement (CLA) signers list by incorporating a new entry for Thanka Bharathi TM. This ensures that all contributions from this individual comply with the project's CLA requirements.

Highlights

  • CLA Signer Addition: Added "Thanka Bharathi TM" to the cla-signers.json file, including their GitHub username, email, and signed date to fulfill CLA requirements.
  • Documentation Update: This change is categorized as a documentation update, specifically modifying the project's CLA signers list.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions
Copy link

CLA Verification Failed

The following contributors have not signed the Contributor License Agreement:

  • Thanka Bharathi (thankabharathi@Thanka)

How to Sign

  1. Read the CLA document
  2. Open a CLA signature request
  3. A maintainer will add you to the signers list
  4. Comment recheck on this PR to re-run verification

This check runs automatically. Maintainers can update .github/cla-signers.json to add signers.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a new signatory, Thanka Bharathi TM, to the cla-signers.json file. The change is straightforward and correctly adds a new entry to the list of individual contributors. The JSON format is valid, and the new data is consistent with the existing structure. The change aligns with the purpose stated in the pull request description and appears correct.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/cla-signers.json (1)

3-3: Update last_updated field to reflect today's date.

The new signer entry has signed_date of "2026-01-13", but the file's last_updated field still shows "2026-01-12". Consider updating it to "2026-01-13" to maintain consistency.

Suggested fix
-  "last_updated": "2026-01-12",
+  "last_updated": "2026-01-13",
📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5413bec and fb697b5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/cla-signers.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/cla-signers.json (1)

234-242: Verify the name format matches the legal name.

The entry is well-formed and follows the existing schema. However, the linked issue #588 specifies the full legal name as "Thanka Bharathi T M" (with a space between T and M), while the entry has "Thanka Bharathi TM" (no space).

If "TM" is the intended format, this looks good. Otherwise, consider updating to match the exact legal name from the CLA submission.

Potential fix if space is required
-      "name": "Thanka Bharathi TM",
+      "name": "Thanka Bharathi T M",

Copy link
Collaborator

@Anshgrover23 Anshgrover23 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@Anshgrover23 Anshgrover23 merged commit a4d2281 into cortexlinux:main Jan 13, 2026
15 of 17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CLA Signature: Thanka Bharathi

2 participants