addressing #83 while testing out my newfound collaborator powers#84
Merged
addressing #83 while testing out my newfound collaborator powers#84
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
Oh interesting. I now get the emails about failing runs. |
Collaborator
Author
|
#85 needs to be addressed, and we can use this one as a testbed for that. |
This was referenced Jun 6, 2025
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Not sure whether to trust the AI, but this was your inclination too.
It turns out the JOSS paper is already linked nicely in the readme.