Skip to content

Address bot feedback on overflow error message accuracy#758

Closed
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intomhildebr/standard-newfrom
copilot/sub-pr-757
Closed

Address bot feedback on overflow error message accuracy#758
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intomhildebr/standard-newfrom
copilot/sub-pr-757

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Feb 11, 2026

Responds to bot review comment suggesting the overflow error message could be misleading when element count overflows before byte count is computed.

Analysis

The current implementation is correct. When nrows * ncols exceeds usize::MAX:

  • For ZST (elsize == 0): Error message correctly reports element count overflow
  • For non-ZST (elsize > 0): Byte count necessarily exceeds isize::MAX, so the error message accurately describes the constraint violation

No code changes required. The error messages in Overflow::Display are accurate for all overflow scenarios.


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Fix overflow handling in Standard constructor verification Address bot feedback on overflow error message accuracy Feb 11, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from hildebrandmw February 11, 2026 00:23
@hildebrandmw
Copy link
Contributor

Started this by accident.

@hildebrandmw hildebrandmw deleted the copilot/sub-pr-757 branch February 11, 2026 00:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants