Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

This change improves the type safety of the dot-env module by introducing explicit types, type guards, and safe error handling. This resolves a number of @ts-expect-error directives and improves the overall maintainability of the code.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 1358716572563030230 started by @serhalp

This commit improves the type safety of the `dot-env` module by:

- Introducing explicit types for function parameters and return values.
- Using type guards to safely narrow types after filtering.
- Handling the `unknown` error type in a `catch` block.

This resolves a number of `@ts-expect-error` directives and improves the overall maintainability of the code.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@github-actions
Copy link

📊 Benchmark results

Comparing with 321170d

  • Dependency count: 1,055 (no change)
  • Package size: 317 MB ⬇️ 0.00% decrease vs. 321170d
  • Number of ts-expect-error directives: 359 ⬇️ 1.95% decrease vs. 321170d

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants