Skip to content

Conversation

@loic-simon
Copy link
Contributor

@loic-simon loic-simon commented Nov 1, 2025

Add the ability for _pyrepl._module_completer.ModuleCompleter to suggest attributes, in addition to modules.

If the module to import from is not imported yet, ask the user if they want to import it.
This is done by adding the notion of completion action to _pyrepl.completing_reader.CompletingReader:

  • get_completions can return a completion action, in addtion to the suggestions list
  • A completion action is a prompt to show + a callback to call if the user press TAB again
  • The callback can return a message to show instead (here, if import failed)
  • After the callback is fired, get_completions is called again, so it can propose new results (here, module attributes)
  • If the user does any other input than TAB when the prompt is shown, the action is discarded

Other changes:

  • I had to tweak a little the code used to display a message below the prompt, to handle the case when it doesn't fit on the console
  • Some unrelated tests to get the coverage rate of _module_completer to 100% (in a separate commit, I can remove it if needed)

Interactive WebAssembly demo (up to date): https://pyrepl-attributes-import-completion.pages.dev

Possible improvement (probably in a follow-up PR): make modules printing stuff when imported not mess with the prompt ; see this Discourse message

@loic-simon loic-simon changed the title gh-14870: PyREPL auto-complete module attributes in import statements gh-140870: PyREPL auto-complete module attributes in import statements Nov 1, 2025
@tomasr8
Copy link
Member

tomasr8 commented Dec 28, 2025

Some unrelated tests to get the coverage rate of _module_completer to 100% (in a separate commit, I can remove it if needed)

Could you extract those into a separate PR? I think those are nice to have in any case and we can merge it quickly :)

@loic-simon
Copy link
Contributor Author

loic-simon commented Dec 28, 2025

Could you extract those into a separate PR? I think those are nice to have in any case and we can merge it quickly :)

Sure, #143244

@tomasr8
Copy link
Member

tomasr8 commented Dec 28, 2025

Quick initial question, can we disable the prompt for stdlib modules? I don't think there should be any concerns with auto-importing from the stdlib

@loic-simon
Copy link
Contributor Author

We could, yes. I don't think we can decide to auto-import solely on module name (to take care of potential shadowing by first/third-party modules), so we would need to look the module spec location, but since we already have self._is_stdlib_module and self._global_cache that should be easy and fast!

(I'll won't be to get my hands on the code until early January tho)

@tomasr8
Copy link
Member

tomasr8 commented Dec 29, 2025

Yup, we definitely need to look at the module location, not just the name

@loic-simon
Copy link
Contributor Author

loic-simon commented Jan 10, 2026

The new test is quite platform-dependant (I just fixed an iOS + Andoid only fail), it may be a good idea to trigger buildbots on this PR!

@StanFromIreland
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

trigger buildbots on this PR

I can run the buildbots, do you want them now?

@loic-simon
Copy link
Contributor Author

I can run the buildbots, do you want them now?

Yes please! I don't plan any more change on my side.

@StanFromIreland StanFromIreland added the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Jan 11, 2026
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @StanFromIreland for commit 9c80367 🤖

Results will be shown at:

https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid?branch=refs%2Fpull%2F140871%2Fmerge

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the 🔨 test-with-buildbots label again.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Jan 11, 2026
@loic-simon
Copy link
Contributor Author

loic-simon commented Jan 11, 2026

Okay that was useful, buildbot failures analysis:

  • A lot of fails on compression.ztsd not suggestingcompress attribute, which is expected since it is an optional module, I'll use a better test case 😅
  • All Reafleaks buildbots fail on collections.abc not suggesting Buffer, I don't know why but I suppose it's expected too, I'll use another test case
  • iOS ARM64 Simulator has a lot of other fails, I don't quite understand what's going on 🤔
    • maybe an importer cache issue like last time? I'll add some invalidation
Details

Missing compression.ztsd:

AMD64 Debian root PR
AMD64 RHEL8 FIPS Only Blake2 Builtin Hash PR
AMD64 RHEL8 LTO + PGO PR
AMD64 RHEL8 LTO PR
AMD64 RHEL8 PR
AMD64 RHEL8 Refleaks PR
AMD64 Ubuntu Shared PR
ARM64 MacOS M1 NoGIL PR
ARM64 MacOS M1 Refleaks NoGIL PR
ARM64 Raspbian Debug PR
ARM64 Raspbian PR
PPC64LE RHEL8 LTO + PGO PR
PPC64LE RHEL8 LTO PR
PPC64LE RHEL8 PR
PPC64LE RHEL8 Refleaks PR
s390x Fedora Stable Clang Installed PR
s390x Fedora Stable Clang PR
s390x Fedora Stable LTO + PGO PR
s390x Fedora Stable LTO PR
s390x Fedora Stable PR
s390x Fedora Stable Refleaks PR
s390x RHEL8 LTO + PGO PR
s390x RHEL8 LTO PR
s390x RHEL8 PR
s390x RHEL8 Refleaks PR
s390x RHEL9 LTO + PGO PR
s390x RHEL9 LTO PR
s390x RHEL9 PR
s390x RHEL9 Refleaks PR
x86-64 MacOS Intel ASAN NoGIL PR
x86-64 MacOS Intel NoGIL PR

Missing collections.abc.Buffer:

Missing AMD64 CentOS9 NoGIL Refleaks PR
AMD64 FreeBSD Refleaks PR
AMD64 RHEL8 Refleaks PR
ARM64 MacOS M1 Refleaks NoGIL PR
PPC64LE RHEL8 Refleaks PR
s390x Fedora Stable Refleaks PR
s390x RHEL8 Refleaks PR
s390x RHEL9 Refleaks PR

A lot of fails:

iOS ARM64 Simulator PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants