Attach res.doc to polyvariant

[shulhi]

Fix #8154

[pkg-pr-new]

Open in StackBlitz

rescript

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript@8155

@rescript/darwin-arm64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript/@rescript/darwin-arm64@8155

@rescript/darwin-x64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript/@rescript/darwin-x64@8155

@rescript/linux-arm64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript/@rescript/linux-arm64@8155

@rescript/linux-x64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript/@rescript/linux-x64@8155

@rescript/runtime

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript/@rescript/runtime@8155

@rescript/win32-x64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript/@rescript/win32-x64@8155

commit: 799de70

[cknitt]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

To use Codex here, create a Codex account and connect to github.

[cknitt]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e77f67f950

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[cknitt]

@shulhi Could you address the comment from Codex?

[shulhi]

@shulhi Could you address the comment from Codex?

Fixed. Added test for this case as well. Pretty impressive catch by Codex as well.