Skip to content

Conversation

@timothy-nunn
Copy link
Collaborator

There has been some desire to track the runtime of PROCESS so we can reason about the speed impact of pull requests. Obviously, this tracking won't be perfect and we expect reasonable fluctuations depending on the GitHub runner, the load of the runner, and other random factors. However, it will shows us the trend and will be able to flag any drastic changes.

@timothy-nunn timothy-nunn requested a review from a team as a code owner February 12, 2026 10:13
@je-cook je-cook self-assigned this Feb 12, 2026
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 33.33333% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 46.49%. Comparing base (e827793) to head (b56e6ac).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
process/scan.py 14.28% 6 Missing ⚠️
process/caller.py 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4092      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   46.49%   46.49%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         124      124              
  Lines       28955    28961       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        13464    13465       +1     
- Misses      15491    15496       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants