chore(cla): Add Piyushrathoree

[Piyushrathoree]

Related Issue

Closes ##559

Summary

AI Disclosure

• No AI used
• AI/IDE/Agents used (please describe below)

Checklist

• PR title follows format: type(scope): description or [scope] description
• MVP label added if closing MVP issue
• Update "Cortex -h" (if needed)

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Added a new contributor license agreement signer to the public records.
  • Updated the published list of CLA signers to reflect the latest entry and ensure contributor records are current.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Added a new individual signer object for Piyush Rathore to the CLA signers registry file .github/cla-signers.json (name, GitHub username, email, signed date, and CLA version).

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
CLA Signers Registry ​.github/cla-signers.json	Inserted a new object into the individuals array: { "name": "Piyush Rathore", "github_username": "Piyushrathoree", "emails": ["meonpath008@gmail.com"], "signed_date": "2026-01-12", "cla_version": "1.0" }

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Add CLA sign #406 — Also adds a new individual signer entry to .github/cla-signers.json.
• Add Rakesh Jha to CLA signers  #477 — Adds a signer object to the same individuals array in .github/cla-signers.json.
• Added Dhruv-89 to CLA-Signers #419 — Modifies .github/cla-signers.json by inserting a new individual signer entry.

Suggested reviewers

• mikejmorgan-ai

Poem

🐰 A little hop, a JSON cheer,
Piyush's name now blossoms here,
One small object, signed with care,
I nibble code and sniff the air —
Carrots for commits, and joy to share! 🥕

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The PR description template compliance is lacking. The Summary section is empty, and the AI Disclosure checkboxes are unchecked without clarification. The Checklist items remain unchecked without verification.	Complete the Summary section with details about why this CLA signer was added, clarify AI tool usage, and ensure all checklist items are addressed before merging.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'chore(cla): Add Piyushrathoree' accurately describes the main change: adding a CLA signer entry. It follows the conventional format and is specific to the actual changeset.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 14859b8 and 1c4654a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/cla-signers.json

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• .github/cla-signers.json

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: Test (Python 3.11)
• GitHub Check: test (3.12)
• GitHub Check: test (3.10)
• GitHub Check: test (3.11)

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @Piyushrathoree, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request integrates the author, Piyushrathoree, into the project's Contributor License Agreement (CLA) signers list. This action formally acknowledges their agreement to the project's contribution terms, enabling future contributions.

Highlights

• CLA Signer Addition: A new entry for 'Piyush rathore' (GitHub username 'Piyushrathoree') has been added to the .github/cla-signers.json file, formalizing their agreement to the project's Contributor License Agreement with a signed date of '2026-01-12' for CLA version '1.0'.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[github-actions]

CLA Verification Failed

The following contributors have not signed the Contributor License Agreement:

• @Piyushrathoree (PIYUSH RATHORE, 163632958+Piyushrathoree@users.noreply.github.com)
• gemini-code-assist[bot] (176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com)

How to Sign

1. Read the CLA document
2. Open a CLA signature request
3. A maintainer will add you to the signers list
4. Comment recheck on this PR to re-run verification

Verified Signers

• @Anshgrover23 (@Anshgrover23)

---

This check runs automatically. Maintainers can update .github/cla-signers.json to add signers.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request adds a new contributor to the CLA signers list. The change is straightforward, but I've identified a potential typo in the contributor's name, which has been flagged for correction to ensure data accuracy. Additionally, please consider updating the pull request title to follow the repository's conventional commit format as indicated in the PR checklist, for example: chore(cla): Add Piyushrathoree.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR adds a new individual CLA signer "Piyushrathoree" to the CLA signers registry. This is a standard administrative change to track contributor license agreement signatures.

Changes:

• Added a new individual CLA signer entry with name, GitHub username, email, signed date, and CLA version

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[Anshgrover23]

@Piyushrathoree CI check failing of PR title also address gemini comment.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.github/cla-signers.json (1)

206-214: New CLA signer entry looks good.

The entry structure is correct, follows the existing format, and the github_username matches the PR author. The signed_date and cla_version are appropriate.

However, consider updating the last_updated field on line 3 from "2026-01-03" to "2026-01-12" to reflect this addition.

📝 Suggested update for `last_updated`

 {
   "version": "1.0",
-  "last_updated": "2026-01-03",
+  "last_updated": "2026-01-12",
   "individuals": [

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0b83b1c and 8becf9b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/cla-signers.json

[Anshgrover23]

LGTM!

[Piyushrathoree]

@Piyushrathoree CI check failing of PR title also address gemini comment.

done

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud