Added Dhruv-89 to CLA-Signers

[Dhruv-89]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated contributor records.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new CLA signer entry for "Dhruv-89" is added to the individuals array in .github/cla-signers.json, including contact email, GitHub username, and signing metadata dated January 2, 2026.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
CLA Signer Data \.github/cla-signers.json``	Added new individual signer object with name "Dhruv", GitHub username "Dhruv-89", email address, signing date "2026-01-02", and CLA version "1.0" to the individuals array

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Add Ansh Grover to CLA signers #401: Adds a new individual signer entry to the same .github/cla-signers.json individuals array.
• CLA Signature: Kesavaraja M #403: Modifies .github/cla-signers.json by adding a new signer to the individuals array with similar metadata.
• Add Sujay Dongre to CLA signers #398: Adds a different individual signer object to the same .github/cla-signers.json individuals array.

Suggested reviewers

• Suyashd999
• Anshgrover23

Poem

🐰 A signature hops into place,
Dhruv joins the CLA embrace,
JSON entries, neat and tidy,
Welcome aboard, so shiny and bright! ✨

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The pull request description is completely missing. The required template includes sections for Related Issue, Summary, and a Checklist that should be completed.	Add a pull request description following the template: include the related issue number, a summary of the changes, and complete the checklist items.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and directly describes the main change: adding a new CLA signer (Dhruv-89) to the cla-signers.json file.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4af662e and 44af3cb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/cla-signers.json

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: Build Package
• GitHub Check: test (3.11)
• GitHub Check: test (3.10)
• GitHub Check: test (3.12)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/cla-signers.json (1)

89-98: LGTM! CLA signer entry is properly formatted.

The new entry follows the correct structure and includes all required fields. The github_username matches the PR author, and the format is consistent with existing entries.

Minor note: The signed_date of "2026-01-02" is one day after the PR creation date (2026-01-01). This could be due to timezone differences or intentional future dating. Please verify this is correct.

Also note: Email addresses are being stored in plain text, which exposes PII. While this follows the established pattern in this file, be aware this is publicly accessible in the repository.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

CLA Verification Failed

The following contributors have not signed the Contributor License Agreement:

• @Dhruv-89 (Dhruv-89, dhruvborkar21@gmail.com)

How to Sign

1. Read the CLA document
2. Open a CLA signature request
3. A maintainer will add you to the signers list
4. Comment recheck on this PR to re-run verification

---

This check runs automatically. Maintainers can update .github/cla-signers.json to add signers.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)

.github/cla-signers.json (1)

3-3: Update the last_updated field.

The last_updated field should be updated to reflect the date of this modification (2026-01-01 or 2026-01-02) since a new CLA signer entry is being added.

🔎 Proposed fix

-  "last_updated": "2025-12-31",
+  "last_updated": "2026-01-02",

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4af662e and 44af3cb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/cla-signers.json

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: Build Package
• GitHub Check: test (3.11)
• GitHub Check: test (3.10)
• GitHub Check: test (3.12)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/cla-signers.json (1)

89-98: LGTM! CLA signer entry is properly formatted.

The new entry follows the correct structure and includes all required fields. The github_username matches the PR author, and the format is consistent with existing entries.

Minor note: The signed_date of "2026-01-02" is one day after the PR creation date (2026-01-01). This could be due to timezone differences or intentional future dating. Please verify this is correct.

Also note: Email addresses are being stored in plain text, which exposes PII. While this follows the established pattern in this file, be aware this is publicly accessible in the repository.

[Suyashd999]

LGTM, adding @Dhruv-89 to CLA!