Skip to content

Conversation

@lu11y0
Copy link
Contributor

@lu11y0 lu11y0 commented Dec 31, 2025

Related Issue

Closes None

Summary

Checklist

  • Tests pass (pytest tests/)
  • MVP label added if closing MVP issue
  • Update "Cortex -h" (if needed)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated CLA signers list to record a new contributor's signature.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 31, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new CLA signer entry for Krishna (github_username "lu11y0") is added to the individuals array in .github/cla-signers.json. The entry includes contact email "bijjurkrishna@gmail.com", signed date "2025-12-31", and CLA version "1.0", positioned after the Ansh Grover entry with no other file modifications.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
CLA Signer Registration
.github/cla-signers.json
Added new individual signer object for Krishna (lu11y0) with email bijjurkrishna@gmail.com, signed date 2025-12-31, and CLA v1.0

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • Suyashd999
  • mikejmorgan-ai

Poem

🐰 A new contributor hops into the fold,
Krishna's signature in JSON bright and bold,
From lu11y0's account, the pledge is signed,
CLA version one, all aligned!
Welcome to the warren, friend so new! 🎉

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description follows the template structure but is incomplete. The 'Related Issue' field contains 'None', the 'Summary' section is empty, and all checklist items are unchecked without justification. Fill in the Summary section explaining the CLA signature addition, address the 'Closes None' entry, and verify or check the relevant checklist items.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'CLA Signature' is vague and generic. It does not clearly describe what was actually changed—adding a specific CLA signer entry for Krishna. Make the title more specific, e.g., 'Add CLA signature for Krishna' or 'Add lu11y0 to CLA signers list' to clearly indicate the primary change.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 58b806d and 4d56edf.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/cla-signers.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: Build Package
  • GitHub Check: test (3.11)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.10)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.12)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/cla-signers.json (1)

44-52: CLA signature correctly formatted with no duplicates.

The new CLA signer entry for Krishna (lu11y0) is properly structured with all required fields (name, github_username, emails, signed_date, cla_version) and follows the existing format. Verification confirms only one instance of this GitHub username exists in the file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

CLA Verification Failed

The following contributors have not signed the Contributor License Agreement:

  • @lu11y0 (Krishna, bijjurkrishna@gmail.com)

How to Sign

  1. Read the CLA document
  2. Open a CLA signature request
  3. A maintainer will add you to the signers list
  4. Comment recheck on this PR to re-run verification

This check runs automatically. Maintainers can update .github/cla-signers.json to add signers.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link
Collaborator

@Anshgrover23 Anshgrover23 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@Anshgrover23 Anshgrover23 merged commit 8171eca into cortexlinux:main Dec 31, 2025
13 of 15 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 31, 2025
3 tasks
pavanimanchala53 pushed a commit to pavanimanchala53/cortex that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2026
pavanimanchala53 pushed a commit to pavanimanchala53/cortex that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants